Yes!
Even if your comments are like others, they still count. Planning officers group comments by topic, but every individual submission adds to the public weight. The number of objections shows how strong and widespread the opposition is. Ignore anyone who tells you numbers don’t matter — they do!
It’s a way for a developer to ask if the idea of building (e.g. 49 homes) is acceptable in principle. It doesn’t include full details yet.
If outline permission is granted, a more detailed application (called Reserved Matters) comes later to decide the exact layout, design, landscaping, etc.
We’re at the Outline Application stage.
The application can be “called in” by local councillors, meaning it will go to a planning committee for decision instead of just being decided by officers. The Green Man has been called in. A spokesperson will be invited to speak on behalf of those objecting, and the developer will also speak. 3 minutes each. It will then go to a vote.
If it’s approved, the developer still needs permission for Reserved Matters, but the main battle is now — this is the critical stage to object.
These are planning reasons the council must consider, such as:
Impact on Green Belt
Traffic, access and road safety
Poor access or infrastructure
Flood risk and drainage
Wildlife and habitat loss
Visual harm and loss of rural character
Impact on conservation area or heritage assets
Sustainability (walkability, cycling, public transport)
📌 Download a full list of material considerations from our website or social media.
Absolutely not.
Raising concerns about a new housing development does not make you anti-housing, anti-affordable homes, or anti-immigration. These are often misleading labels used to shut down valid community concerns.
You can fully support affordable housing and inclusive communities and still raise valid concerns about a specific development.
Objecting isn’t about saying “no” to new homes — it’s about asking for the right homes, in the right places, with proper infrastructure, access, environmental protection, and respect for local character.
It’s not “NIMBY” (Not In My Back Yard) to want responsible planning.
Objecting is about demanding better planning, not saying “no” to everyone who needs a home.
Comments can be rejected if they contain:
Inappropriate language
Personal or financial issues
Non-material considerations (e.g. house prices)
Stick to the planning issues and your voice will be heard.
No — don’t be fooled. Some developers and councillors may call it “Grey Belt” to make it seem less protected. This is misleading. is not an official planning designation — but it’s a term sometimes used informally or politically to describe Green Belt land that may be considered for future development due to perceived lower environmental or scenic value.
However, it’s not legally recognised. All land designated as Green Belt remains protected in planning policy, unless it is formally removed from the Green Belt through a Local Plan Review process.
That said, when councils review Green Belt land during Local Plan consultations, they often assess sites against certain criteria to judge if land might be ‘suitable’ for release — and this is where the idea of "Grey Belt" comes in
The land is still Green Belt under national planning policy. Whilst it fits some of the criteria for ‘grey belt’, it has not been previously developed, has been used for grazing / farming, and sits on the edge of a conservation area.
The Green Belt protects our countryside from inappropriate development. Here's why it matters:
🛠️ Encourages better development – Protecting Green Belt forces better use of brownfield (already developed) land.
🌆 Stops urban sprawl – Prevents villages like Sandridge from merging into towns like St Albans.
🌳 Safeguards Natural Habitat – Home to bats, owls, foxes, deer and rare species. Building here fragments habitats.
💧 Reduces flood risk – Open land absorbs water. Building on it increases surface runoff and flood potential.
🏘️ Preserves village identity – Helps protect views, rural boundaries and the historic setting of Sandridge.
⚖️ Nationally protected – The Green Belt is part of planning law and can only be built on in exceptional circumstances.
Once it’s gone, it’s gone for good.
These are key sites to watch:
Green Man site – 49 house development
Shottfield Close – 84 house development
Woollam Park – 1,000 homes proposed to the west of the railway, between Harpenden Road and the railway
Sewell Park (Cala) - 150 homes recently approved behind Harpenden Road (to be surrounded by Woollam Park)
Lightwood – (Sandridgebury Farm, between the railway and Heartwood Forest) - waiting on Woollam Park outcome
See the Links to Developers and Other Developments pages for more information
Heartwood landscape will be permanently altered. The pressure will continue until the Green Belt around us is reclassified as ‘available land’. This sets a dangerous precedent for future development.
That’s why every objection matters now.
Not always. There are many examples where developers:
Didn’t build promised cycle lanes
Reduced the affordable housing after approval
Delayed or avoided infrastructure pledges
Even if conditions are set (like cycle lanes, affordable housing or GP provision), developers often apply to remove or reduce them later, claiming they’re no longer “viable”. Many communities are still fighting for promised facilities years after homes are built. Always question what’s promised — there are loopholes!
Often developers reduce the percentage after getting approval, claiming it’s not “viable”.
Without strong community pressure, they get away with it.
✅ Comment on the application (Ref: 5/2025/1218) using material considerations
✅ Talk to your neighbours and raise awareness
✅ Share posts on social media
✅ Join our fundraising efforts — we need to pay for independent experts (e.g. highways or ecology reports)
✅ Help gather local evidence, especially photos or sightings of wildlife, flooding, traffic
✅ Volunteer your skills (design, printing, admin, legal)
Up to now, we’ve had support from local people offering printing, marketing, and advice for free. But to properly challenge this application, we need to pay for:
Professional planning or ecology reports
Independent highways assessments
Legal or expert advice
Every pound helps us stand up for our village.
Because this is your village, your countryside, and your future. It will affect:
🏡 Where you live
🚗 How you travel
🏥 How long you wait to see a doctor
🌳 The fields you walk through
🐾 The wildlife around your home
👶 What’s left for future generations
Common terms:
NPPF – National Planning Policy Framework (sets planning rules)
LPA – Local Planning Authority
CIL – Community Infrastructure Levy
NIMBY – "Not in My Back Yard" (a term often unfairly used to dismiss genuine concerns)
Reserved Matters – Later stage of planning that covers the detailed designs
Material Considerations – Valid planning concerns
Clause 22 – New power to revoke planning permission if developers mislead or give false information. This is a potential tool to hold developers accountable — but it must be used with evidence.
PRoW – Public Right of Way
S106 / Planning Obligation – Agreements where developers fund infrastructure
Submit your comment before the deadline (check planning portal)
Stay engaged – more updates will come when the decision goes to the planning committee
Be ready for future applications (e.g. Shottfield Close)
Please share this website and our campaign far and wide to raise awareness
Sharing this QR code will bring people straight to this website: